Autor |
Nachricht |
Steven Gast
|
Verfasst am: 09. Jun 2010 20:09 Titel: Bitte um Korrektur |
|
|
Hey,
ich muss bis MORGEN (habs erst heut erfahren) einen Text in Englisch abgeben. Hab soweit alles ausgearbeitet, bitte aber vor allem wegen der Grammatik nochmal darum das jmd drüberschaut
Stupid is as stupid does. That´s an inconvenient and brutal definition of stupidity. It matter for the lungs doctor, which is a contradicition in terms, because he´s smoking. It matter for the politician, which prays changes but blocks reforms. It matter for the businessman, which searches without strain for markets and doesn´t see the ideas of his employes. It matter for the sellers, which makes fewer and fewer sales, but refuses schoolings for seller, because he knows everything. And there are parents which supress their children for living their might, but don´t accept this very day what their parents have done, because they had never appreciate them. All this people are, independent of their education, their IQ, their social position, according to the defintion of gump, stupid.
That´s why I agree absolutely with the statement of Forrest Gump. Someone is only stupid, when he does stupid things. But we must distinguish between stupidity, which is played, and the stupidity, which is given by the nature. There can be people, which do stupid things but in an other thing they are slyer, and opposite. And we need to know that all people have an other oppinion to stupidity. The first thinks, that he makes all right, and the next thinks about that the opposite. That´s why is it always the decision from himself, if he makes stupid things and if he thinks that he has done stupid things.
Forrest Gump is right, when he says, that only this one is stupid, which makes stupid things, even though it doesn´t correspond with his view of life. And everyone self must decide, if someone is stupid or not, according to the appearance or other things – because stupid is only this one, which makes stupid things.
In my oppinion Forrest Gump is not stupid, because all he had done, premeditated or not , has making him become a star or a hero.
Danke im Vorraus
Steven |
|
|
Anna555 Gast
|
Verfasst am: 11. Jun 2010 13:06 Titel: Verbesserung |
|
|
Stupid is as stupid does. That´s an inconvenient and brutal definition of stupidity. It matters for the lungs doctor, which is a contradicition in terms, because he´s smoking. It matters for the politician, who prays changes but blocks reforms. It matters for the businessman, who searches without strain for markets and doesn´t see the ideas of his employees. It matters for the seller, who makes fewer and fewer sales, but refuses training , because he thinks that he knows everything. And there are parents who abuse their power by supressing their children, but don´t accept this very day what their parents have done, because they never appreciated them (der ganze Satz ist leider unverständlich - ich weiß nicht, was der ausdrücken soll).
All this people are, independent of their education, their IQ, their social position, according to the definition of Gump, stupid.
That´s why I absolutely agree with the statement of Forrest Gump. Someone is only stupid, when he does stupid things. But we must distinguish between stupidity, which is acted, and stupidity, which is given by (ohne artikel) nature. There can be people, who [b]usually [/b]do stupid things but in a special field they are cleverer then others. And we need to know that everyone has a different opinion about stupidity.
One may think he's doing fine, and another one thinks the opposite about that. That´s why it is always your own decision, if you do stupid things and if you consider them stupid.
Forrest Gump is right, when he says, that only this one is stupid, who does stupid things, even though it doesn´t correspond with his view of life. And everyone must decide on his own, if someone is stupid or not, according to the appearance or other things – because stupid is only the one, who does stupid things.
In my oppinion Forrest Gump is not stupid, because all he had done, premeditated or not, made him a star or even a hero. |
|
|
|
|