graefchen
Anmeldungsdatum: 11.03.2007 Beiträge: 4
|
Verfasst am: 12. März 2007 15:31 Titel: |
|
|
Hey ella,
firstly your text seems to be a little bit "untidy", it would have been better to put aspects dealing with each other in one paragraph, but therefore you have to structure your analysis in paragraphs!
To your grammar:
Zitat: | In the picture I see two empty chairs. The picture is black and white and without any colours/ colourless. In the background is one man who has a chair at his back (What do you want to say with this?). He seems to be very happy. There are very big houses with a lot of balconies. I think the atmosphere in the picture is peaceful and not loud and hectic but it´s al litttle bit overhelmed (I think you mean "overwhelming"). I think the two chairs are empty because the photograph wants to show the lonliness although there are so many houses an they stand all beside the other ones (besser: terraced houses). The photo is different to (besser: differs from) the painting because the other one is colourful. But I think the two photos (Why photos? There are one photo and one painting, aren't there?) want to show the same because in both pictures (It's the same here) you can see that the people feel alone although there are other people or houses. I think the photo is more effective than the painting because in my opinon you could discern earlier what is meen (meant?) with the picture or painting.I think the photo is without colours because the photograph wants that you only look at / pay attention on important things and not at little ones. On the photo there is no one at the chairs but on the painting there are two people I think that the people know each other but they are alone and on the photo there are so many people living in the street but you are alone. |
If there are any questions, don't hesitate to ask! |
|