Autor	Nachricht
Goldenhind	Verfasst am: 09. Okt 2007 13:48    Titel: Imho sind deine Änderungen alle in Ordnung.
Luethien	Verfasst am: 08. Okt 2007 20:09    Titel: bei responsibilites meinte ich verantwortliche. hab mich da aber in der bedeutung etwas vertan. hab es auf responsible perosn geändert. The value of a contract can be right reviewed was meinst du damit? Soll "right" sich auf reviewed beziehn? Dann brauchst du ein Adverb...in matter of the contract period. --> passt es wenn ich dann schreibe can be reviewed rightly? ven when outsourcing sounds really easy it is the opposite. So an outsourcer has to be 20 % betterhab es so geschrieben: ... be better than a person taking his operations in-house. hoffe du hast nochmal zeit zum durchlesen. lg
Goldenhind	Verfasst am: 08. Okt 2007 18:50    Titel: Re: Summary: Outsourcing Luethien hat Folgendes geschrieben: The article der hat doch sicher einen Namen (Überschrift)... was published on13 May 2007 in the “The Observer” by Simon Caulkin. Nowadays outsourcing plays a big part in business life. It is reality that companies can lose a lot of money being unable to reduce costs as well as (to) offer the same prices like companies doing outsourcing. The compass Wenn das ein Eigenname ist, musst du das groß schreiben, a management consultancy has controlled nach meinem Gefühl nicht das richtige Wort, evtl. besser "examined" o.ä. a lot of contracts in Europe and the US finding out that services in-house are cheaper than outsourcing them. Because of this it gets more and more modern to shift back operations in-house inasmuch as they cannot offer the needed know-how anymore. In spite of this, outsourcing will not lose its attraction. The main hidden agenda is that you are able to outsource unnecessary operations by laying off staff to save costs. This is called lift and ship by having a good strategy like playing football. The value of a contract can be right reviewed was meinst du damit? Soll "right" sich auf reviewed beziehn? Dann brauchst du ein Adverb...in matter of the contract period. Often the responsibilities was meinst du mit "responsibilites"? ("Verantwortlichkeiten"?) ignore this focusing only on permanent procurement. Even when outsourcing sounds really easy it is the opposite. So an outsourcer has to be 20 % better besser als wer/was? because he hast to focus on covering costs for the survival of the company not being balanced by low-wages or loosely environmental regulations in a country. In conclusion das klingt jetzt ein bisschen so, als ob es deine eigene Conclusion wäre, du solltest hier noch einmal klar machen, dass das der Autor des Textes sagt (z.B. durch ein "according to Caulkin" oder "Caulkin concludes that..."), it is very important to think off which operations you would like to outsource and which you keep in-house.
Luethien	Verfasst am: 08. Okt 2007 12:13    Titel: Summary: Outsourcing hallo! wir müssen eine summary zu einen relativ schwierigen text schreiben. hoffe jemand kann meine summary auf fehler korrigieren. danke im voraus. lg The article was published on13 May 2007 in the “The Observer” by Simon Caulkin. Nowadays outsourcing plays a big part in business life. It is reality that companies can lose a lot of money being unable to reduce costs as well as offer the same prices like companies doing outsourcing. The compass, a management consultancy has controlled a lot of contracts in Europe and the US finding out that services in-house are cheaper as outsource them. Because of this it gets more and more modern to shift back operations in-house inasmuch as they not anymore can offer the needed know-how. Although outsourcing will not loses its attraction. The main hidden agenda is that you are able to outsource unnecessary operations by laying off staff to save costs. This is called lift and ship by having a good strategy like playing football. The value of a contract can be right reviewed in matter of the contract period. Often the responsibilities ignore this focusing only on permanent procurement. Even when outsourcing sounds really easy it is the opposite. So an outsourcer has to be 20 % better because he hast to focus on covering costs for the survival of the company not being balanced by low-wages or loosely environmental regulations in a country. In conclusion, it is very important to think off which operations you would like to outsource and which you keep in-house.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group