Autor	Nachricht
Goldenhind	Verfasst am: 17. Sep 2007 21:56    Titel: Ich glaube "domestic" anstatt von "homelike" würde besser passen, da letzteres afaik nur "heimisch" im Sinne eines Hauses nicht eines Landes meint. Außerdem finde ich deine Conclusion nicht ganz in sich schlüssig. Einerseits sagst du, ein unvorbereiteter Beitritt könnte zu mehr Armut führen, aber andererseits meinst du, dass Ängste vor einer Beschädigung des Arbeitsmarktes unbegründet sind. Wie passt das zusammen?
Luethien	Verfasst am: 17. Sep 2007 20:01    Titel: danke fürs korrigieren. den letzten satz hätte ich noch einmal geändert. hoffe du könntest mir noch einmal helfen. In conclusion, the entry of Turkey could increase poverty when Turkey does an entry without any preparation. The fear, that an entry would harm the homelike employment market, is unfounded. danke im voraus. lg
Goldenhind	Verfasst am: 16. Sep 2007 10:23    Titel: Re: Summary: EU Beitritt der Türkei Luethien hat Folgendes geschrieben: The last obstacle for the Turkish entry is poverty and not religion. There are also different images of economic "economic" ist das Adjektiv, bist du sicher, dass du nicht das Nomen "economy" meinst? and in some respects the big population might be a problem because consequently Turkey would have a majority in the EU Die Türkei hätte doch keine Mehrheit in der EU, sie könnte höchstens Deutschland als einwohnerreichstes Land irgendwann überholen.. For instance, the Turkish per capita income is only half of the Polish. However there is a fifty-fifty chance that the economy will change in a better way or it will get marred. Because of this, the EU should have an eye on Turkey's economic development and support it over an extended period of time. These actions are really important because Turkey’s economy was really unstable in the last four years. In matters of inflation the IMF had to support Turkey and now the economy rises. Although a tenth of the population has to get by with 2 € a day and Turkey cannot keep abreast of things like education and actuarial survival rates of babies. In conclusion, the entry of Turkey could increase (ich verstehe nicht, warum du von einem Wachstum der Armut durch einen EU Beitritt redest...) their poverty more than it would harm the homelike "homelike" scheint mir hier das falsche Wort zu sein employment market because of the market system of the EU.
Luethien	Verfasst am: 16. Sep 2007 01:04    Titel: Summary: EU Beitritt der Türkei hallo! hoffe mir kann jemand helfen und meinen text auf fehler verbessern. danke im voraus. lg The last blockade of the Turkish entry is the poverty and not the religion. There are also different images of economic and in some respects the big population might be a problem because consequently Turkey would have a majority in the EU. For instance, the Turkish income per head is only the half of the polish. However there is a fifty-fifth chance that the economy will change in a better way or it will get marred. Because of this, the EU should have an eye on the Turkish’s economic development and support it over an extended period of time. These actions are really important because Turkey’s economy wars really unstable in the last four years. In fact of inflation the IMF had to support Turkey and now the economy rises. Although a tenth of the population has to get by with 2 € a day and Turkey can not keep abreast of things like education and actuarial survival rates of babies. In conclusion, the entry of Turkey could more increase their poverty as it would harm the homelike employment market because of the market system of the EU.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group