Startseite
Forum
Fragen
Suchen
Über Uns
Registrieren
Login
FAQ
Suchen
Foren-Übersicht
->
Sonstiges
Antwort schreiben
Benutzername
(du bist
nicht
eingeloggt!)
Titel
Nachrichtentext
Smilies
Weitere Smilies ansehen
Schriftfarbe:
Standard
Dunkelrot
Rot
Orange
Braun
Gelb
Grün
Oliv
Cyan
Blau
Dunkelblau
Indigo
Violett
Weiß
Schwarz
Schriftgröße:
Schriftgröße
Winzig
Klein
Normal
Groß
Riesig
Tags schließen
[quote="Leah"]Hello guys i have a question to you. maybe it could be oldfashioned but i am very interesseted in this topic that´s why PLEASE answer, i want to hear your own opinion..it could be also very short or very long..That´s up to YOU bye Here the question: Do you think a "Change" will occur in the USA because of Obama´s preseidency? Pls answer, bye[/quote]
Optionen
HTML ist
aus
BBCode
ist
an
Smilies sind
an
BBCode in diesem Beitrag deaktivieren
Smilies in diesem Beitrag deaktivieren
Spamschutz
Text aus Bild eingeben
Alle Zeiten sind GMT + 1 Stunde
Gehe zu:
Forum auswählen
Themenbereiche
----------------
Englisch Grundstufe
Grammatik
Textanalysen und Interpretationen
Übersetzungen und Vokabeln
Landeskunde
Sonstiges
Sonstiges
----------------
Off-Topic
Ankündigungen
Thema-Überblick
Autor
Nachricht
MI
Verfasst am: 22. März 2009 19:10
Titel:
Let me return some questions:
How do you define change in a world that sees constant change? The word itself was cleverly chosen by Obama's election campaign as change always occurs in politics, but is a term nearly unmeasurable for lack of reference system. Or else put: If we apply Heraklit's idea of constant change, how can we measure change?
How about the idea behind "change"? Will Obama's presidency see changes to the USA that really affect everybody so much that they will afterwards say "Yes, there was a change"? Here I am perfectly sure that it will, but not because of Obama, but because of the world economic crisis (etc.), which affects America even more than Europe and already leads to new phenomena that most people there have not seen in their lives. Here, once again, Obama's words are well chosen, because - although he gave it a positive connotation for his campaign - the word "change" itself is neutral and even more, everybody understands different things by "change". Some might for example think that a privatization of a big bank is a change bigger than any change during the last precidencies, others might not see a change at all.
Thus the question must be: What did HE mean by "change" and will that be changed? According to the media, he already tackled many items on his agenda, but we must await the end of his presidency before we can juxtapose his agenda and actual achievements. If they are similar, then "change" occured, otherwise it didn't.
What I really want to express here is that we can say whether Obama's promised "Change" will occur or not only by comparing his agenda and his achievements. In my opinion, we must not even look at the circumstances for evaluation, as it is not question of a complete evaluation of Obama's presidency. What does that imply? It implies that we could conclude that he mastered heavy crisis, where he really "made a difference" and that he was a great leader, but still we could see that there was no "change".
Leah
Verfasst am: 20. März 2009 17:59
Titel: survey (umfrage)
Hello guys
i have a question to you. maybe it could be oldfashioned but i am very interesseted in this topic that´s why PLEASE answer, i want to hear your own opinion..it could be also very short or very long..That´s up to YOU
bye
Here the question:
Do you think a "Change" will occur in the USA because of Obama´s preseidency?
Pls answer,
bye